Editorial: Critical Eating Dis/Order Studies: Madly Questioning Eating Orders
Main Article Content
Abstract
This Special Issue: “Critical Eating Dis/Order Studies: Madly Questioning Eating Orders” is an introduction and invitation into thinking through and with CEDS. What we are calling Critical Eating Dis/Order Studies offers a transdisciplinary space of social action that works to bridge the academic-community divide, is supported by the leadership of Mad and other eating order resisters, and co-builds toward futures where eating orders cease to systemically shape our everyday lives. Knowledges created by those who are labelled as “mentally ill” are routinely debased and silenced inside and outside the academy (Leblanc & Kinsella, 2016) – an ongoing lived reality for those of us who are deemed to be “eating disordered.” We are stereotyped as uncredible, untrustworthy, and incapable of making our own decisions or having a valid perspective (Holmes et al., 2021; Lester, 2019; Malson et al., 2011; Schott & Langan, 2015; Schott, Spring & Langan, 2016). These prevalent beliefs are used to silence us while justifying forced compliance in ways that maintain – and make more possible – the systemic abuses of power that are hurting us (Kendall, 2014; Schott, 2022; Schott, 2024; Schott & Langan, 2024). Against the – monocropping – grain, and towards radical change led by eating dis/order communities, we embrace Mad eating dis/order knowledge producers and artistic creators as valid, valuable, and vital.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant IMSJ right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC ND) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in IMSJ.
References
Geertz, C. (1973). Description: Towards an Interpretive Theory of Culture. Basic Books, New York.
Holmes, S., Malson, H., & Semlyen, J. (2021). Regulating “untrustworthy patients”: Constructions of “trust” and “distrust” in accounts of inpatient treatment for anorexia. Feminism & Psychology, 31(1), 41–61.
Kendall, S. (2014). Anorexia nervosa: The diagnosis. A postmodern ethics contribution to the bioethics debate on involuntary treatment for anorexia nervosa. Bioethical Inquiry, 11(3), 31-40.
Leblanc, S., & Kinsella, E. A. (2016). Toward epistemic justice: A critically reflexive examination of ‘sanism’ and implications for knowledge generation. Studies in Social Justice, 10(1), 59-78.
Lester, R. J. (2019). Famished: Eating Disorders and Failed Care in America. University of California Press.
Malson, H., Bailey, L., Clarke, S. Treasure, J., Anderson, G. & Kohn, M. (2011). Un/imaginable future selves: A discourse analysis of in-patients’ talk about recovery from an eating disorder. European Eating Disorders Review, 19, 25–36.
Reid, J., Snyder, S. N., Voronka, J., Landry, D., & Church, K. (2019). Mobilizing mad art in the neoliberal university: Resisting regulatory efforts by inscribing art as political practice. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 13(3), 255-271.
Schott, N. & Langan, D. (2015). Pro-anorexia/bulimia censorship and public service announcements: The price of controlling women. Media, Culture & Society, 37(8), 1158-1175.
Schott, N., Spring, L., & Langan, D. (2016). Contextualising pro-ana/mia websites within neoliberal culture: Performance as a tool to disrupt the pathologizing of girls and women. Studies in Social Justice, 10(1), 95-115.
Schott, N. (2022). Pro-ana/mia performance ethnography: Remaking responses to psychiatric relations to ‘eating disorders.’ [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto]. TSpace.
Schott, N. (2024). Madly resisting eating orders. Asylum, 31(3), 12.
Schott, N. & Langan, D. (2024). Moving beyond “recovery”: Exposing and disrupting the eating dis/order industrial complex. International Mad Studies Journal, 2(1), 1-21.